Press "Enter" to skip to content

Republicans Struggle with Transparency

Last updated on 2015.03.10

Republicans are struggling with the concept of transparency in Washington and in Pierre. Speaker John Boehner and the House GOP, for instance, have been having trouble keeping their promise to open up the legislative process:

For example, Boehner and his top leaders suggested they would move bills through committees and allow an open, transparent amendment process.

But at this point, not a single bill has been sent through a committee in regular order, and Republicans held the PATRIOT Act vote open beyond its 15-minute window Tuesday night. Open rules have morphed into "modified open rules." (see: House to pass Patriot Act extension) [Jake Sherman and John Bresnahan, "Growing Pains: GOP Stumbles," Politico.com, 2011.02.09].

House GOP starlet Kristi Noem is also struggling with openness. Read her bumbling vagueries as she takes pains to avoid mentioning her new K Street friends:

"I think there's certainly a desire for people to get us as much information as we want," South Dakota Rep. Kristi Noem, a freshman representative to the GOP leadership, told POLITICO. Noem said she's had "quite a few meetings with different groups providing us information," though she declined to go into detail [Darren Samuelsohn, "K Street Takes Lawmakers to School," Politico.com, 2011.02.10].

Congresswoman Noem is apparently so busy lining up her hair appointment before breakfast with multi-million-dollar lobbyists K&L Gates next Thursday at 8:30 (8:30?! How can anyone wait that long for breakfast?) that she hasn't gotten around to setting up her Aberdeen field office:

If Kristi Noem is interested in representing all South Dakotans, where are her district offices located? What are her office hours and who are her staffers?

As I recall, Stephanie Herseth Sandlin had people setting up her Aberdeen office the very first day after winning her first election.

Noem, what are the answers to these questions? We all deserve to know [Karen Goodall, letter to the editor, Aberdeen American News, 2011.02.09].

Check Noem's website: nope, still no Aberdeen office.

Meanwhile, back in Pierre, some of our legislators are keeping some secrets from the public in the form of placeholders bills. Consider HB 1208, which is on the House Education agenda for Monday. The bill consists of one sentence:

Section 1. The Legislature shall utilize this bill to identify and repeal certain unnecessary education mandates to enable the public school system to operate more economically.

This isn't legislation. This is a paper shell, waiting for the sponsors to figure out what they want to do and spring the details on us in committee Monday. There are other placeholders in the hopper to "affect health care" (ditto) and "affect medical services." When a placeholder bill like this heads to committee, how can folks affected mobilize to contact committee members or even drive to Pierre to testify? Suppose Senate Majority Leader Russell Olson (R-8/Wentworth) is planning to repeal physical education mandates so schools no longer have to build all that expensive physical education classroom space. Shouldn't Senator Olson, as a prime sponsor of HB 1208, have to publicize that intent and the associated bill text so the physical education lobby can send delegates to testify in opposition at the first committee hearing?

Speaking of Russ and access to information, the Senate Majority Leader is still blocking me from following or re-Tweeting his Twitter feed. This petty insult to a constituent is akin to barring a citizen from asking a question at a crackerbarrel. What an embarrassment, and what a bad example for the Republicans Olson is trying to lead.

Let's get with the program, Republicans, in Washington and Pierre. The people want information, not closed-door meetings and sneaky bills and votes. And open up that Twitter feed, Russ!

Update 2011.02.13 12:22 CST: The Legislature does list all hoghoused bills on one convenient Hoghouse page. That service may not get us to the first hearing in time to testify, but it's still useful for keeping track of the monkey business in Pierre.

8 Comments

  1. mike 2011.02.11

    Why isn't there an Aberdeen office for Kristi Noem yet? Isn't it the 3rd largest city in the state?

    Most of my friends in Aberdeen have said that Noem didn't ever campaign there so they've never met her.

    She is going to have to find someone who knows people in that region and is well liked to help her up there. Her staffers up there will need to be really well liked people.

    Sounds like she doesn't know anyone up there though.

  2. snapper 2011.02.11

    I'm pretty sure Thune has an office in Rapid, Aberdeen and Sioux Falls.

    Why is Noem having hers in Sioux Falls, Watertown and Rapid? Aren't Watertown and SF geographically close to each other? Aberdeen is kind of up there by itself.

    Herseth didn't have an office in Brookings just because she lived there.

    Why didn't she just ask Thune what he did?

  3. snapper 2011.02.11

    Looks to me that Noem is more concerned about herself than serving her constituents.

    Is the only reason to have an office in Watertown because that is where Noem lives?

  4. caheidelberger Post author | 2011.02.11

    Wait: Noem is setting up shop in Watertown? I haven't heard that yet. Source?

  5. David Newquist 2011.02.11

    She intends to have a part-time staffer come to Aberdeen. About 90 percent of the work in a field office is case work for people having difficulties with government agencies, such as the VA, SS, etc. No point in setting up an office if you are working to eliminate government services.

  6. mike 2011.02.12

    It's a lose lose for Noem to have an office in Watertown. Citizens of Watertown don't expect to have an office because they are in between SF and Aberdeen.

    Moving an office out of Aberdeen only means that Aberdeen lost something. So I don't know what her plan is but it sounds like her staff sold her a load of crap on this plan.

    Noem is planning on serving the 3rd largest city in the state with a part-time staffer? What? How will that work? Will that person have an office and if he/she does does that mean that the door will be locked most of the time when a constituent goes to the office?

    Ask Thune's people, Janklow's, Daschle's, Johnsons's, Herseth's people if it's a good idea to have an office in Aberdeen. I'm sure they all have (had) one there because geographically speaking it is easier to serve constituents if the land mass is broken down.

    Sounds like Noem is more concerned about serving herself than her constituents. Otherwise why would she want an office in Watertown? (I believe Thune's SF office serves Watertown) does she really think she is going to have time to work in her office in Watertown?

    Please!

  7. mike 2011.02.12

    Herseth didn't have an office in Brookings just because she lived there.

Comments are closed.