While Pat Powers continues to be too distracted by his sponsors' press releases to get around to a real SDGOP convention recap, Ken Santema serves us the full text of South Dakota Republicans' latest statewide embarrassment, the SDGOP's resolution calling for the impeachment of the President:
WHEREAS, The president of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and protect it from all enemies both foreign and domestic,
WHEREAS, The president has violated his oath of office in numerous ways with the latest being the release of five terrorists in exchange for a soldier without consulting Congress as required by law,
WHEREAS, The president of the United States has willfully and wantonly lied to the American people telling them they can keep their insurance company, and they can keep their doctor under Obama Care, prior to an election,
WHEREAS, The president has ordered Federal Agencies to enact rules (laws) that threaten the security of the people of this great nation (EPA regulations) by passing Congress and usurping its authority,
WHEREAS, the president has abused his executive privilege usurping his authority as decided by numerous federal courts,
WHEREAS, The Constitution and Declaration of Independence are very clear on the authority of the President and the Federal Government, and when they violate their oath it is the right, it is the duty of the American people to act,
WHEREAS, America was designed as a Lex Rex (the law is king) rather than a Rex Lex (The King is the law) system of government. It is a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
THEREFORE, be it resolved that the South Dakota Republican Party calls on our U.S. Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president of the United States [South Dakota Republican Party, resolution, passed at statewide convention, Rapid City, SD, 2014.06.21, reported by Ken Santema, "About the SD GOP Resolution Calling for Obama's Impeachment," SoDakLiberty, 2014.06.23].
Reporter David Montgomery adds value by breaking down the vote on that resolution by county. We find twelve counties whose delegations voted unanimously against the resolution:
| Beadle | Clark | Jerauld | McPherson |
| Bennett | Codington | Jones | Potter |
| Brule | Day | McCook | Spink |
I'd like to believe that counties where even the Republican convention delegates think impeaching President Obama is silly are counties where we will find widespread sanity. But notice that all but one of those counties—Day—picked Mitt Romney over Barack Obama in 2012, and aside from Bennett and Jerauld, those counties gave Romney a double-digit margin.
Perhaps more useful to Democrats (or advocates of sanity and practical policy in general) looking for places to make inroads is this list of the twenty counties that didn't send anyone to the SDGOP convention in Rapid City:
| Bon Homme | Faulk | Hutchinson | Sully |
| Buffalo | Grant | Hyde | Todd |
| Corson | Gregory | Kingsbury | Tripp |
| Dewey | Hand | Marshall | Walworth |
| Douglas | Hanson | Sanborn | Ziebach |
Those convention no-shows include six counties that went for Obama in 2012 and 2008—Buffalo, Corson, Dewey, Marshall, Todd, and Ziebach. We Dems probably have those counties covered, but it doesn't hurt to press the advantage.
The no-shows include ten counties—Douglas, Faulk, Gregory, Hand, Hanson, Hutchinson, Hyde, Sully, Tripp, and Walworth—that turned out stronger for Romney and McCain than the statewide averages. Those latter ten aren't Democratic strongholds, but their local party organizations lacked the resources or the enthusiasm to muster delegations for the convention. Might there be an organizing vacuum that clever partisans could exploit?
The no-shows include four counties—Bon Homme, Grant, Kingsbury, and Sanborn—that went against Obama in 2012 and 2008 but only near or below the statewide averages. Bon Homme is split between Districts 19 and 21. District 19 includes Hanson County, home of numerous disaffected Stace Nelson supporters. I'd recommend a little targeted Democratic advertising to push the Legislative race... but District 19 is one place where we fielded no Democratic Legislative candidates. Maybe next time?
Meanwhile, in the District 21 side of Bon Homme, perhaps Democratic Rep. Julie Bartling and her ballot-mate Carrie Ackerman Rice could challenge GOP Rep. Lee Qualm to defend his party's impeachment resolution. Ditto in Grant County, where incumbent Democrat Rep. Kathy Tyler and her ticket-mate Peggy Schuelke could razz Republican challengers Fred Deutsch and John Wiik about impeachment. Delegate Deutsch voted against the resolution, along with his unified Codington County delegation, but every second Deutsch and fellow Republican House candidate John Wiik have to spend explaining their party's silliness is a second they aren't making the case for themselves against reasonable Democrats.
Rep. Peggy Gibson and Democratic Senate contender Darrell Raschke should go over to Democratic House candidate Joan Wollschlager's place in Lake Preston and stir up her neighbors to force District 22 GOP Senator Jim White and Rep. Dick Werner to explain their party's impeachment resolution.
The SDGOP convention impeachment vote is just one small dataset out of the multitude of information Democrats need to use to run smart and win in November. But these numbers provide some small pieces to add to the puzzle.
Representatives is plural and South Dakota has a single representative. Hmmmnn?
Whoever runs against Krebs might want to remind people that she is behind a tax increase on citizen motorists.
http://www.keloland.com/newsdetail.cfm/sd-gas-tax-increase-met-with-mixed-opinions/?id=91314
Allen Unruh is just unruhig about President Obama canceling the faith-based corporate welfare that kept the Alpha Center and Unruh family finances fat and happy under President Bush. If President Obama kept the free money coming, Unruh would be shoveling it up with both hands while complaining about it - just like our state government does.
Some folks just want to impeach every Democratic President, but develop blinders when the President is a Republican. They think selling weapons to Iran and funding terrorists in central America in violation of a ban by Congress was o.k., but lying about an extramarital affair warrants impeachment.
Is providing healthcare for poor Americans, protecting the environment, and a prisoner of war swap really all they can come up with to justify their call for impeachment? Not very imaginative, these "asshats."
Well, they did get one thing done, they managed to make SD the laughing stock of most of the rest of the country. I'm getting to the point I'm ashamed to tell people where I live.
Right, Tim. We will soon be known as the Mississippi of the North.
Loren,
South Dakota is already known as the Mississippi of the North.
Another thing we have in common with Mississippi is that they are ranked the #1 most corrupt state while South Dakota is #2.
We would be #1 in corruption if the criminals would get caught. Instead we have a good old boy network where they cover for each other.
and still no answer from Rounds if he supports impeaching Obama, unless I missed it.
However, Robert Skjonsberg, is doing a good job of ripping people on Twitter and not getting Rounds to answer the question.
This is intriguing, the impeachment resolution passed by only 15 votes.
Does this vote represent the great divide in the SDGOP and how relevant will that be in November?
Roger, if there is any hope, it lies in the closeness of that vote. Democrats' making hay of that vote is worth a shot for Democrats. Don't make it the centerpiece of the campaign; just use it in the context of other arguments: "While my opponent's party wants to waste time playing debating society and impeaching the President, I just want to go to Pierre and get things done, like funding schools and paving roads."
The Republicans need to impeach the impeachers.
The Dems should disband and go rogue Republican.
The SD Republican impeachment resolution made the Washington Post today. Tim, it was Laughing Stock level coverage. Yes, if I could find it again I'd include a link.
Mississippi should be worried about becoming "The South Dakota of the South."
After doing everything in their power to sabotage the ACA, the SD GOP wants to impeach the President because they think it doesn't work. Unruh probably won't miss the federal subsidy so much now that he will be getting money from our state. He made sure SD passed a law that allows only The Alpha Center to offer the state-mandated abortion counseling required for South Dakota women.
SDBlue, maybe the SD GOP wants to impeach the President because they are afraid that the ACA will work. Some people just do not like being proven wrong.
Good article posted by the Displaced Plainsman regarding impeachment http://thedisplacedplainsman.blogspot.com/2014/06/a-modest-proposal-to-guide-south-dakota.html
(Hey, Owen! Are you trying out a new online nickname?)
Plainsman's linkage of impeachment for Obama and war crimes for Bush and Cheney is brilliant. Impeaching Obama out of ACA rage is not. After all, even in a crazy world where impeachment would succeed, the Republicans would still have to get through President Biden.
Deb, were you looking at this Washington Post post, in which Jaime Fuller catalogs numerous impeachment calls over the last five years?
The South Dakota Republican Party asks, "Is you is or is you ain't my constituency?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3eTSbC3neA
Yep Cory. That's the one.