Press "Enter" to skip to content

Madison Loses 127 Million Gallons of Water?

Last updated on 2011.02.11

Help me out, engineering friends. Take a look at this historical chart of Madison's water usage, which appears in the agenda packet for the next commission meeting (Monday, Feb. 14):

City of Madison Water Usage 1989-2010
City of Madison Water Production and Sales 1989-2010

Last year the city pumped 329 million gallons of water, the fourth-highest amount in the last two decades. Madison sold 184 million gallons of water, the lowest annual amount over the same period.

The city pumped 145 million gallons that it didn't sell. It can account for 12.5% of that water. That indicates 127 million gallons of water came out of the city pumps and went... where?

Perspective: 127 million gallons would cover 390 acres with one foot of water... or my one-acre yard with 390 feet of water.

390 acre circle, centered at Egan-34 intersection, Madison, SD
127 million gallons of water would cover 390 acres with one foot of water. The green circle shows 390 acres centered at the Egan Avenue-Highway 34 intersection in Madison, SD.

127 million gallons not accounted for? Hmm... if I were a Congressperson looking to spend federal dollars to pipe a million gallons a day to Madison via the Lewis and Clark pipeline, I might first ask whether a third of that water would disappear once it hit Madison's infrastructure.

By the way, consider this: DENR says the water industry goal for unaccounted-for water is 10%. Madison hasn't hit that goal once in 21 years.

3 Comments

  1. Nick Nemec 2011.02.12

    Major leaks, or hundreds of tiny leaks in the system could account for the loss. Other possibilities are unauthorized taps, backyard hydrants that bypass the meter or buildings hooked up that the city doesn't know about. Is the city pool metered? Does it leak? It might be a combination of all of these things.

  2. Michael Black 2011.02.13

    You assume that the pipeline will be built. I would not bet money on that happening.

  3. caheidelberger Post author | 2011.02.13

    I make no such assumption. Neither should the city... and if we could track down and conserve that missing 30%, how much longer might we be able to postpone the big federal earmark investment in extending that water system to our doorstep?

Comments are closed.