Press "Enter" to skip to content

Lake Area Improvement Corporation Breaks State Law on Financial Reports

Last updated on 2012.01.17

In discussing the Lake Area Improvement Corporation's begging for public dollars, I have previously cited state statute that empowers the county to obtain and review financial records of any non-profit organization receiving county funds. Here is the statute in question, SDCL 7-18-12:

7-18-12. Expenditures for industrial, tourist and recreational activities to nonprofit corporations or associations--Reports required--Inspection of books and records. The board of county commissioners may promote industrial, tourist, and recreational activities and make payment from the general fund to nonprofit corporations or associations engaged in promotion either within or outside of the boundaries of the county. Any nonprofit corporation or association which accepts funds from a board of county commissioners, shall file an annual report of all receipts and expenditures with the county auditor not later than December thirty-first of each year. All books and records of the nonprofit corporation or association may be inspected by any member of the board of county commissioners, or by any agent or attorney representing the board, for any proper purpose at any reasonable time [emphasis mine].

SDCL 7-18-12 has been on the books since 1969, with amendment in 1985.

Eager to review all receipts and expenditures of the Lake Area Improvement Corporation, I visited the Lake County Courthouse and asked to see the reports submitted by the LAIC under SDCL 7-18-12.

The auditor could find no such reports.

The Lake Area Improvement Corporation has received funding from the Lake County Commission every year since 1998 except for 2001 and 2009. Those disbursements through the end of this fiscal year total $230,000. An extensive search of county records reveals that the LAIC has not once fulfilled its statutory obligation to submit a report of its receipts and expenditures to Lake County.

Now I can understand how one tiny clause in one tiny state law might escape a person's attention. After all, how on earth could any average citizen who's busy with a family and a job and everything else be expected to find out about some arcane financial reporting requirement for county-funded non-profit organizations?

Dwaine Chapel, Executive Director, Lake Area Improvement Corporation
Good grief, Dwaine: how many times do I have do your job for you? And when does the LAIC start paying me?

Oh, let's cut the crap. We're not talking about some average citizen. The Lake Area Improvement Corporation is a high-powered, high-finance organization made up of local business and government leaders. It pays an executive director over $100,000 a year to navigate complex questions of finance and taxes and law. Yet somehow they've managed to operate for fourteen years without noticing that they are violating a pretty basic financial reporting requirement.

If someone were paying me $100,000 a year and I broke the law multiple times, I'd expect to hear about it. I might even expect not to be doing that job much longer.

p.s.: My first legislative prediction for 2012: Senator Russell Olson, a former executive director of the LAIC responsible for violating SDCL 7-18-12 himself, will introduce a bill to repeal SDCL 7-18-12 or to amend SDCL 1-27-1.5 to explicitly exempt economic development corporation receipt and expense reports from South Dakota's public records law.

4 Comments

  1. Great RESEARCH work Cory! You get an A+ on this research!

    Now, I would agree that the LAIC needs to submit these financial records. But, the problem with that would be a breach in their "confidentiality" policy that we know is protecting our potential of 500 jobs! We don't want the community knowing how many corporate hand-outs have been given, otherwise those companies might leave or not create jobs. ;)

    Seriously though, laws are being broke. Reports are not being made public. Statistics are being skewed and exagerated. Where is the accountability?

    Sounds like the County Commission, City Commission, and the greater public need to put more pressure on the LAIC to come clean.

  2. Michael Black 2011.08.05

    Notice the law says County Commissioner, Agent or Attorney can have access. It does not say anything about a individual citizen being able to read the report on demand. Information could still be withheld from the general public.

  3. Linda McIntyre 2011.08.05

    Information could still be withheld from the general public, right. But apparently there haven't even been any reports filed! If so, that is the problem. If some more worthwhile projects are unable to funded due to lack of county funds (from my taxes), then I think the county commissioners should at least have financial reports from all those agencies that request funding in order to responsibly allocate its limited funds/tax dollars.

  4. caheidelberger Post author | 2011.08.05

    I did notice that, Michael. But the law has two parts. The part you cite refers to all books and records. (Expect me to run for commission just for that opportunity.) The line about submitting an annual report of all receipts and expenditures is a separate requirement that places one specific document in the county files for public inspection. I inspected such documents from other non-profits yesterday. you and I can't walk into the Depot and ask to see what's in Dwaine's file cabinet (I've tried), but you and I can walk into the auditor's office and ask to see the contents of her file cabinet with respect to county-funded non-profits.

Comments are closed.