Press "Enter" to skip to content

Blog Control Acts Author Noel Hamiel Enters SD Newspaper Hall of Fame

Last updated on 2013.04.24

If any of you see reason why these two should not be wed, speak now...

The South Dakota Newspaper Association is inducting longtime newspaperman Noel Hamiel into its Hall of Fame this month. I herewith tender my official protest, or at least least my official asterisk, to Hamiel's exaltation.

SDNA President Lucy Halverson says her organization is bestowing this honor on Hamiel because he "has had a positive, powerful impact not only on the newspaper industry in South Dakota, but throughout our state as well." However, during his two-year tenure as a Representative from District 20 in the South Dakota Legislature, Hamiel sought to have a negative impact on that online citizen journalism that complements and competes with his industry.

Hamiel was the prime House sponsor of the 2010 Blog Control Acts. This vague, sloppy legislation would have imposed onerous legal burdens on bloggers and other citizens using the Internet to share news and commentary. Hamiel's two bills would have required bloggers and others to keep detailed records of every person who visited their websites and created new legal liabilities for folks who maintain websites that allow comments. These record-keeping requirements and legal risks would likely have shut down blogs and chilled online speech across South Dakota.

Hamiel disingenuously claimed he was simply trying to put online media and traditional press on a level playing field, while he blocked efforts to allow online media to compete with the traditional press as outlets for public notices. His confused and inconsistent rationalizations for his Blog Control Acts were as shakily revealing of ignorance of and spite toward online citizen journalism as the defenses this year of HB 1234 were of K-12 education.

Hamiel's legislation failed in committee. The South Dakota Legislature has since followed the advice and counterproposals of various bloggers and stayed out of trying to fix an unquantified problem that must not have been as pressing as Hamiel pretended.

In advocating the Blog Control Acts, Hamiel came across as an advocate for one special interest, the newspaper industry, seeking to impose chilling burdens on the free speech of others to preserve his industry's competitive advantage. I suppose if you are the newspaper industry, that's plenty of reason to honor one of your fellows.

I know my protest is thin. I'd try to phrase it in terms of the newspaper association's bylaws and specific Newspaper Hall of Fame qualifications... but, predictably, one can't find that information on the SDNA's website or on the website of the SDSU Journalism Department, which keeps the Hall of Fame plaques and records. And even if I could, Hamiel's réumé contains all sorts of other evidence that he's a generally nice guy who has served his industry and his community well.

But it bears remembering that Noel Hamiel supported significant First Amendment restrictions on the online speech of all South Dakotans. Such advocacy against the First Amendment warrants at least an asterisk on Hamiel's nice new plaque in the Newspaper Hall of Fame.

3 Comments

  1. Owen Reitzel 2012.04.11

    I worked at the Daily Republic (still do) as a part time sports writer and being a liberal I would get into some good political discussions with Noel.
    This continued when he became publisher and even when I worked full at the paper doing page layout.
    I agree with you Cory on his attempt to muzzle bloggers.
    I have respect for him even when it comes to his political views. I would hope he feels the same about me.
    I have no problem with him going to the HOF.

  2. caheidelberger Post author | 2012.04.11

    If I recall correctly, Mr. Hamiel contacted me by e-mail during the HB 1234 debates and asked what I thought could be done better. I appreciated that openness to discussion. I will not picket his Hall of Fame induction. But Hamiel and those honoring him need this reminder of his somewhat industry-centric support for the First Amendment.

  3. Rod Hall 2013.03.22

    As a Mitchell School Board candidate in 2013 I appreciate your continuing effort to keep the public informed. I am troubled very much by Mitchell's plan for up to $50 million in new highschool buildings and Davison County continuing to offer many TIF's for 20 years and possible 10 year extentions. Those nice new homes and apartments provide many children to be educated. Sadly, the taxes for schools does not keep up. Therefore the widows in Mitchell will have their homes taxed more!

Comments are closed.