Press "Enter" to skip to content

SB 148-150 Restore State Authority on Uranium Mining, Toughen Pollution Rules

Legislators were doing their homework over the long weekend: lots of bills are popping into the hopper!

Among the goodies I find are a three-pack of good environmental protection bills brought by Senator Jim Bradford (D-27/Pine Ridge), Rep. Troy Heinert (D-26A/Mission), and Rep. Kevin Killer (D-27/Pine Ridge).

  • Senate Bill 148 takes another stab at reinstating the state's authority to regulate in situ leach mining for uranium. SB 148 would reverse the deregulatory gift the Legislature handed in 2011 to aspiring Canadian uranium miners Powertech, which seeks to enrich itself by wrecking Black Hills water.
  • Senate Bill 150 also runs right up Powertech's alley. This bill gives the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources more power to block in situ mining permits if the proposed mining threatens our groundwater. If an in situ mining applicant can pass muster with the state, SB 150 tightens the standards for restoring the groundwater that mining operation impacts.
  • Senate Bill 149 sneaks in between these direct challenges to the Powertech lobby and offers some stiffer penalties for any environmental violators in the state. Right now, if the DENR discovers in an environmental audit that an individual or corporation broke some environmental rule and didn't disclose it, that violator gets a 30-day grace period to write up that violation and report it after the fact to the state and avoid any civil penalty or criminal punishment. SB 149 rewrites that clause to eliminate the grace period and say the DENR will seek punishment for such environmental offenders. SB 149 also gives the DENR the option to shut down any operation that cannot correct any violations found during an environmental audit within sixty days.

Someone in Pierre (first in line: all three of Powertech's well-heeled lobbyists) is probably already shouting, "Over-regulation!" But Senator Bradford and his associates are on the right track. Neither Powertech nor anyone else should be able to buy a free pass to pollute with the mere promise of a few temporary jobs. These three bills restore and toughen some useful state-level environmental protections.

6 Comments

  1. Donald Pay 2013.01.22

    Powertech is an empty shell of a company. At this point it's a stalking horse for some other company. The people still with this shell of a company have never operated an in-situ uranium mine---the guy who had some experience is no longer with them. So we know all this company wants is a cheap permit so it can sell out quick and make a fast buck. To whom is it selling out? What if it's someone with Chinese or Middle Eastern connections? South Dakota uranium could go to help make the Iranian nuke. Watch Mike Rounds senate run implode if that happens.

    No one in their right mind would allow this group of Powetech clowns anywhere near a real mine, let alone a mine that produces radioactive material. The company is just about broke, and the people left running it are well known sleaze balls and borderline frauds. The only way they survive is if they can somehow fool some dumb investors into forking over some more money. Synatom, the Belgian company, got taken for millions, so it is probably pretty easy to put one over on the idiot SD legislators.

  2. grudznick 2013.01.22

    Go Senator Bradford!

  3. caheidelberger Post author | 2013.01.23

    Don, do you know whether Powertech has any active mining operations?

  4. Dana P. 2013.01.23

    Wow, I love hearing that we actually do have some leaders that actually care about the environment. Great to see. I hope South Dakotans are paying attention learning more and more about this.

  5. Tom Emanuel 2013.01.24

    To the best of my knowledge, Powertech has never mined anything, ever. They're a refrigerator company. After they were effectively booted from Colorado, the Dewey-Burdock project would be their first crack at mineral resource extraction. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

  6. larry kurtz 2013.02.01

    "Seven generations in hindsight seem like ancient history, but if we look into the future seven generations to our great-great-great-great grandchildren, they will still be maximally affected by any released uranium toxicity, and significant risk will remain to their descendants for up to another 1993 generations into the future! That in human terms is almost forever."

    http://www.wpcva.com/opinion/article_afd3ab10-6c9d-11e2-975a-0019bb2963f4.html

Comments are closed.