Press "Enter" to skip to content

Brooks v. Gant Dismissal Affirms Indian Complaints about Voting Access

Don't let Pat Powers fool you: the dismissal of the voting rights lawsuit Brooks v. Gant yesterday was a win for Native American voters, not for South Dakota's Secretary of State. Judge Karen Schreier dismissed the lawsuit because the state has done what the American Indian plaintiffs said was the right thing to do: set up an early-voting station in Shannon County so Pine Ridge voters wouldn't have to drive all the way to the Fall River County courthouse to enjoy the same access to the polls as their mostly white neighbors.

Shannon and Todd County voters don't have a courthouse and thus lacked in-county early voting prior to 2012. Those conditions provoked the lawsuit. Gant used federal Help America Vote Act money to set up satellite voting stations in both counties in 2012. According to Jonathan Ellis, Gant has also committed to maintaining the satellite voting station in Shannon County for the next three statewide elections.

The dismissal of Brooks v. Gant certainly won't help the Secretary has he battles a new voting rights complaint. Yesterday Four Directions filed a complaint with the Justice Department's civil rights division over Secretary Gant's specious evasion on using HAVA funds to establish satellite voting centers in the reservation communities of Fort Thompson, Wanblee, and Eagle Butte. The only thing distinguishing the situation in those communities from Shannon and Todd counties is the existence of a courthouse in Buffalo, Jackson, and Dewey counties. But the practical issues on access are the same: a protected class of voters who suffer institutional racism and economic distress find themselves more geographically isolated from voting opportunities than their white fellow citizens.

Shannon and Todd counties provided clear cases where Secretary Gant had the authority to use HAVA funds for their intended purpose of creating more polling places and expanding poll access for American Indians. So do the counties where Four Directions would like support from HAVA funds. The only reason Secretary Gant has to say no to more early voting stations on the reservation is his fear that more Indian voters will vote against him and his fellow Republicans.


  1. mike 2013.08.07

    There is much talk on war college about Shantel Krebs stepping in to save the GOP from its problems. Is the GOP base gearing up to remove Gant from office or are these just more mindless rumors?

  2. Dave 2013.08.07

    Gov. George Mickelson, whose accomplishments included the call for a Year of Reconciliation between Native American and non-Native South Dakotans before his death 20 years ago, must be spinning in his grave right now.

  3. caheidelberger Post author | 2013.08.08

    Good point, Dave. Helping Indians vote should eb a no-brainer. HAVA says do it. The duties of the Secretary of State say do it. A SoS who balks at doing it on the pretext of needed federal guidance to make explicit his power to do it is hiding baser motives.

    Mike, again, I ascribe no credibility to PP's manufactured and unsourced stories. But PP wouldn't say such things for no reason. Has he broken with Gant, and if so, why? Would Team Rounds assert control, demand Powers get in line, and promise his more patronage? If PP hasn't broken with Gant, what would Gant gain by bruiting such rumors of a convention challenge?

Comments are closed.