...and do it with apps!
Cody Hausman spoke to the Sioux Falls Democratic Forum last Friday on behalf of his generation. The son of Brandon City Councilwoman and 2012 District 9 House candidate Jo Hausman discussed how Democrats (and any other interested party) should brand themselves to recruit youth voters and volunteers.
Hausman could have gotten himself thrown out at the start. He admitted that he worked for Ron Paul in 2012. Hausman said he helped organize a 3000-person rally in St. Paul for the good Texas doctor. Anyone who can use "organize" and "Ron Paul" in the same sentence deserves either extra credit or a medical exam.
Actually, I'll cut Hausman some slack. I recognize the youthful idealism that would lead one down the prim-Paul path. And Hausman's Paul story speaks to the idealism that he says is key to reaching his generation. Hausman says today's young people have a strong idealist streak... which stands at odds with the just slightly older Ryan Casey's assessment that millennials are practical problem solvers, in contrast to the baby boom idealists.
Hausman contends that Republicans do a good job of campaigning on emotions and ideals, while Democrats like to get all wonky. He says the Tea Party hasn't captured the youth vote, but their anti-government message does resonate with a generation that has a 1984 conception of government (suspicious of surveillance, zealous of privacy... even as they Facebook their lives?). Hausman recommends an Apple branding strategy: make government look sleek and stylish, show young people what value they can get from it, but don't trouble them with the greasy, gritty inner workings.
Hausman does identify some policies where Democrats seeking the youth vote should make noise. As we wait for the economy to reboot from the 2008 recession, young people are carrying big student debt from loans calculated on expected income from jobs that are not materializing. That makes young people kind of anxious. Hausman recommends expanding Pell Grants and creating a sort of Works Progress Administration for young management grads: invest in public worksand put young people in charge to give them management experience.
Hausman also stresses the importance of civil rights. He says current young voters are uniquely diverse; they've grown up with lots of people who don't look like them or love like them, and they're fine with that. On gay rights and marriage equality in particular, the morality train has left the station. No matter how icky the sex is (really, Steve Hickey? you want to go there?), young voters are already committed to the idea that whom you choose to love should not affect your legal rights. The rallies in Rapid City against the Legislature's outbreak of homophobia this winter show that Hausman has a point: Democrats can inspire young people by showing themselves to be bold leaders on that fight, willing to give those young people a chance to speak up and make real changes in South Dakota's marriage policies.
On practical party building, Hausman says Democrats should recognize the unique talents of his generation. He says his people are creative innovators who can bring technology to bear for the party. Hausman says sending young people door to door may not be the best use of their talents, that instead they might add more value by researching online apps to promote candidates and get out the vote.
I get the impression Hausman doesn't like knocking on doors much. A lot of people don't: it's scary, it's tiring, and it takes excellent conversation skills. I wouldn't have been good at it when I was 20. I still need practice at it at age 43. There will be folks with different strengths in every generation: even among Hausman's generation, we can find campaigners who are great at face-to-face campaigning. I'd hate to assume that, just because a campaign volunteer is under 30, she won't win more votes for me on the front porch than on Facebook.
In South Dakota, knocking on doors, retail politics, is a necessity. The Web and smartphone apps don't penetrate our older, rural electorate enough to turn a candidate from underdog to frontrunner. Social media is great for nationwide campaigning and fundraising, but if you want to win in South Dakota, you still have to knock on every door and face every face you and your volunteers can... and then buy a truckload of ads on KELO. If any party wants to engage youth in the campaign, yeah, apps are great projects, but we need to engage young people in our most important and most productive work. Sequestering all the young volunteers in the computer room while everyone else is out handshaking and jawboning donors and voters and really moving the needle will make those young people feel marginalized. Even if we have a great social media development team (and we need one!), there comes a point in every campaign where the boss walks in and says, "Everyone, drop what you're doing, hit the phones, and hit the streets!"
Hausman's speech brought lots of questions from the older-skewing Democratic Forum audience, and he handled all questions ably (chowing, Cody, that you might be better at door-to-door campaigning than you let on about your generation!). Hausman's roadmap gives Democrats interested in reaching across generations a lot to think about.
"creating a sort of Works Progress Administration for young management grads: invest in public worksand put young people in charge to give them management experience."
Whoa, I can't believe that you wrote that. Oh there is no doubt that we need some managers, but we also need a lot of workers to do WPA type situations. My Father was in the CCCs at a buck a day in the 1930s. He got to keep 5 bucks a month and send the other 25 home to Grandpa and Grandma to try to save the farm. The insurance companies ended up owning the farm anyway, even though the farm was paid for. But they could not get enough of a crop to pay the seed loan for about 3 years in a row.
I know plenty of folks who think they should start at the top, but to get experience to be at the top they need to have done the work so they know what has to be done. What we need is a government willing to spend the money do do the infrastructure repair and rebuild that needs so desperately to be done.
Imagine what it would be like if instead of the state monies that were invested pursuing economic development, those same monies had been used to rebuild the county and township roads and bridges that were so devastated by the high water in the mid first decade of this century.
Rethuglicans excel at fear mongering-scaring old and young alike with tales of rogue gubmint policies and regs. They also tout free market garbage that only seems to work for the 1% and that is good enough for wingnuts. The 99% have to pull themselves up by their bootstraps,if they can find work that pays a decent wage. Like I always say,dumbass dubya can't be accused of discriminating against minorities. When appointed Potus he looked around and found the two minoriest groups he could put the full faith and credit of the US behind-millionaires and billionaires. See how that worked out for them.
Good point, Lanny. Are we allowed to say, "Too many chiefs, not enough Indians"?
We do have a lot of infrastructure repair and other public projects we could invest in for immediate and ongoing economic stimulus. We could put a lot of people to work, whether wielding the shovel or telling folks where to dig. I wonder: just how many of the apprentice-management positions Hausman seeks could we create in a full tilt 21st-Century WPA?
I'm thinking that not many people of any age will find shovel-wielding enticing. Those who do will certainly be welcome. What about tech crews? They can build topnotch web sites for all kinds of governmental and nonprofit agencies.
And creativity! Outline a particular problem or issue, present it to a group of maybe half a dozen, and get out of the way. No rules, no parameters. Just get out of the way.
I like the management options too. Big businesses are really focusing on mentorships and internships. Provide those opportunities.
This Hausman is spot on. We need more of this type of thinking and much less of this crap http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/steve-hickey-anal-sex-letter-south-dakota
Man, we now have two crazies that have made the national scene. What a pride we must feel to be giggled at like your pants are unzipped. Opps, sorry about that, don't want to give Hickey the wrong idea.
Comments are closed.